Which U.S. ZIP Codes Have the Most Registered Prior Sex Offenders per Capita?
Public discussion about registered prior sex offenders often sparks strong opinions, but the reality is more complex than many people realize. The United States maintains one of the most stringent registry systems in the world, with an estimated 800,000 individuals. While the registry is intended to support law enforcement and promote transparency, it is important to understand the legal, social, and economic context behind these numbers.
In this report from Gelman Law Firm, we used national and state data to discover which 50 counties have the highest per capita number of registered prior sex offenders and delve into some of the complex reasons why these clusters exist.
Understanding the Registry
Registration is not a criminal punishment, it’s a civil requirement. Federal and state laws, such as Megan’s Law and the Adam Walsh Act, mandate registration for certain offenses, but the system applies a broad brush to a wide range of cases.
The registry is governed by a framework of guidelines that states implement with varying requirements. For example, New Jersey’s Megan’s Law sets out a tier-based classification system, which determines levels of community notification based on risk assessment, a key area where the Gelman Law Firm offers trusted guidance and advocacy. These classifications can profoundly impact a person’s future, making it critical to have experienced legal counsel to navigate this system.
It’s also important to recognize that society has long valued the principle that once individuals have served their time, rehabilitation and reintegration are central goals. Many people who have completed their sentences participate in treatment, education, and counseling programs that help reduce the likelihood of reoffending. Nevertheless, society has chosen to maintain the registry system, showing how society continues to wrestle with balancing public interest and giving people a second chance.
Why Do Some ZIP Codes Have More Registered Individuals?
The clustering of registered individuals in certain ZIP codes is shaped by a mix of legal, economic, and geographic factors, and doesn’t necessarily reflect anything about the character or behavior of the people living there.
Legal and Residency Restrictions
Many states impose zoning laws that restrict where registrants can reside, particularly near schools, parks, or daycare centers.These restrictions often have the unintended effect of concentrating registrants into smaller, more affordable neighborhoods. For example, in El Paso, which ranks highest on the list, local ordinances significantly limit available housing, driving many individuals to specific ZIP codes.
Housing Affordability and Economic Barriers
Individuals subject to registration often encounter considerable challenges reintegrating into society, including difficulty securing employment and housing. In cities like Los Angeles, registrants frequently settle in ZIP codes with more affordable housing options, not as a matter of choice but due to limited opportunities. For example, the 90003 ZIP code in Los Angeles has a cost of living 7.9% lower than the state average and ranks among the nation’s highest for per capita registrations.
Population Density
Urban areas with dense populations naturally have larger absolute numbers of registrants. Cities like New York, with ZIP codes in the Bronx and Brooklyn, appear prominently in the data due to their size and density, not necessarily because of any differences in behavior or background.
Rethinking the Impact of High Concentrations
While public registries were initially designed to provide transparency, they have sometimes led to unintended social consequences, including the stigmatization of entire neighborhoods and individuals. It’s important to recognize that not all registrants have the same background and characteristics, and many have worked hard to rebuild their lives and reintegrate into their communities.
A complex combination of legal, economic, and social factors influences where registered individuals reside. While the registry provides a framework for transparency and accountability, it also presents opportunities for ongoing dialogue and thoughtful, evidence-based policy improvements.
Registration does not have to be a permanent condition for all individuals. Under certain circumstances, Megan’s Law removal may be possible. For example, removal may be possible in New Jersey, if at least 15 years have passed since the conviction or release, no new offenses have been committed, and the person no longer poses a threat to others.
The Importance of Experienced Legal Representation
At Gelman Law Firm, we advocate for fair treatment of individuals on the registry, emphasizing the importance of proper tier classification under Megan’s Law, as well as the possibility of Megan’s Law removal when eligible. We also defend individuals facing failure to register charges, understanding that compliance issues are often the result of confusion or misunderstanding rather than malicious intent.
In New Jersey, failure to register as an Individual with a prior sexual offense can lead to significant penalties, including up to five years in prison and fines up to $15,000. Gelman Law Firm’s attorneys provide skilled defense for clients facing failure-to-register charges, helping protect their rights and resolve these complex legal matters.
Gelman Law Firm has a proven track record of helping individuals protect their rights, challenge unfair designations, and regain control over their futures. We approach each case with compassion, discretion, and a firm commitment to achieving the best possible outcome.
What ZIP Codes Have the Most Registrants?
Our analysis examined the 250 largest ZIP codes in the United States to identify those with the highest number of registrants per capita. It’s important to note that some individuals may appear multiple times on registry lists due to record overlaps, and that raw numbers don’t necessarily reflect anything about the overall character or safety of a community.
The 50 U.S. ZIP Codes with the Most Registered Sex Offenders per Capita
ZIP Code | ZIP Code Population | Number of Public Sex Offender Registries | ZIP Code | Public Sex Offender Registrations per 10,000 People | |
1 | 79928 | 78,971 | 358 | El Paso, TX | 45.33 |
2 | 90003 | 72,764 | 325 | Los Angeles, CA | 44.66 |
3 | 60085 | 71,609 | 300 | Waukegan, IL | 41.89 |
4 | 75217 | 85,330 | 352 | Dallas, TX | 41.25 |
5 | 33311 | 69,413 | 259 | Fort Lauderdale, FL | 37.31 |
6 | 60617 | 77,270 | 286 | Chicago, IL | 37.01 |
7 | 10466 | 70,420 | 241 | Bronx, NY | 34.22 |
8 | 10457 | 77,488 | 237 | Bronx, NY | 30.59 |
9 | 10468 | 78,238 | 235 | Bronx, NY | 30.04 |
10 | 90044 | 94,354 | 284 | Los Angeles, CA | 30.10 |
11 | 11207 | 100,330 | 283 | Brooklyn, NY | 28.21 |
12 | 11212 | 91,574 | 255 | Brooklyn, NY | 27.85 |
13 | 10456 | 93,412 | 247 | Bronx, NY | 26.44 |
14 | 95206 | 69,350 | 182 | Stockton, CA | 26.24 |
15 | 95823 | 81,212 | 210 | Sacramento, CA | 25.86 |
16 | 11233 | 75,399 | 191 | Brooklyn, NY | 25.33 |
17 | 93230 | 68,412 | 169 | Hanford, CA | 24.70 |
18 | 11208 | 101,958 | 247 | Brooklyn, NY | 24.23 |
19 | 75211 | 70,695 | 170 | Dallas, TX | 24.05 |
20 | 20002 | 69,422 | 165 | Washington, DC | 23.77 |
21 | 10458 | 81,299 | 192 | Bronx, NY | 23.62 |
22 | 93535 | 82,149 | 194 | Lancaster, CA | 23.62 |
23 | 92509 | 78,166 | 182 | Jurupa Valley, CA | 23.28 |
24 | 10467 | 103,660 | 236 | Bronx, NY | 22.77 |
25 | 30281 | 69,540 | 153 | Stockbridge, GA | 22.00 |
26 | 94509 | 69,931 | 153 | Antioch, CA | 21.88 |
27 | 93307 | 88,338 | 190 | Bakersfield, CA | 21.51 |
28 | 10453 | 81,951 | 172 | Bronx, NY | 20.99 |
29 | 84015 | 68,548 | 143 | Clearfield, UT | 20.86 |
30 | 93274 | 78,493 | 162 | Tulare, CA | 20.64 |
31 | 11221 | 89,222 | 182 | Brooklyn, NY | 20.40 |
32 | 63376 | 76,064 | 154 | Saint Peters, MO | 20.25 |
33 | 80013 | 75,099 | 152 | Aurora, CO | 20.24 |
34 | 76028 | 74,023 | 149 | Burleson, TX | 20.13 |
35 | 37042 | 83,498 | 168 | Clarksville, TN | 20.12 |
36 | 78542 | 84,678 | 170 | Edinburg, TX | 20.08 |
37 | 92345 | 86,499 | 171 | Hesperia, CA | 19.77 |
38 | 90011 | 102,308 | 199 | Los Angeles, CA | 19.45 |
39 | 79938 | 96,353 | 185 | El Paso, TX | 19.20 |
40 | 78577 | 79,937 | 153 | Pharr, TX | 19.14 |
41 | 93722 | 87,364 | 167 | Fresno, CA | 19.12 |
42 | 10469 | 71,571 | 135 | Bronx, NY | 18.86 |
43 | 10452 | 77,564 | 145 | Bronx, NY | 18.69 |
44 | 92553 | 76,761 | 143 | Moreno Valley, CA | 18.63 |
45 | 94533 | 77,380 | 143 | Fairfield, CA | 18.48 |
46 | 93257 | 79,569 | 145 | Porterville, CA | 18.22 |
47 | 92021 | 70,584 | 127 | El Cajon, CA | 17.99 |
48 | 60623 | 87,649 | 156 | Chicago, IL | 17.80 |
49 | 14850 | 69,271 | 123 | Ithaca, NY | 17.76 |
50 | 23464 | 75,118 | 133 | Virginia Beach, VA | 17.71 |
Sources: